Fredriksson, A; Kjellsdotter Ivert, L and Naz, F (2025) Creating logistics service value in construction: A quest of coordinating modules in a loosely coupled system. Construction Management and Economics, 43(6), pp. 428-445. ISSN 0144-6193
Abstract
Logistics plays a crucial role in the construction industry due to its numerous actors, frequent transportation needs, significant community impact, and high level of variability. However, there is a lack of awareness among actors regarding the importance of logistics and how it can create value. The purpose of this paper is to increase the understanding of the logistics service value co-creation process in construction. Methodologically, the study uses interviews involving third-party logistics (TPL) providers, main contractors, and subcontractors. Service blueprinting is employed to visualise logistics services within a construction logistics setup (CLS). It was found that in a loosely coupled system like construction, value co-creation is driven by trust and commitment, allowing the necessary time for learning. Service blueprinting helps visualise the connection between service design and the value of different service modules. However, risks include delayed actor involvement downstream the supply chain and potential lack of coordination between service modules, especially with multiple TPL providers. A contribution to the logistics service literature is that modularisation makes it easier to design the service content; however, the number of actors may increase. Hence, the modularisation simplifies the service content but not the service value creation or the value co-creation process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction supply chain; logistics service modules; third-party logistics; value co-creation |
| Index terms: | main contractor, module, construction supply chain, construction logistics, modularization, variability, coordination, construction industry, third-party logistic, interview, commitment, value creation, value co-creation, subcontractor |
| Subjects: | psychology, practitioner, building construction, economic development, architectural elements, supplier oversight, value management, construction logistics, data collection methods, statistical analysis, industry analysis, management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Supply Chain Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here