Project control system (PCS) implementation in engineering and construction projects: An empirical study in Saudi's petroleum and chemical industry

Jawad, S; Ledwith, A and Khan, R (2022) Project control system (PCS) implementation in engineering and construction projects: An empirical study in Saudi's petroleum and chemical industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(13), pp. 181-207. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: There is growing recognition that effective project control systems (PCS) are critical to the success of projects. The relationship between the individual elements of PCS and successfully achieving project objectives has yet to be explored. This research investigates the enablers and barriers that influence the elements of PCS success and drive project objectives. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts a mixed approach of descriptive analysis and regression models to explore the impact of six PCS elements on project outcomes. Petroleum and chemical projects in Saudi Arabia were selected as a case study to validate the research model. Findings: Data from a survey of 400 project managers in Saudi's petroleum and chemical industry reveal that successful PCS are the key to achieving all project outcomes, but they are particularly critical for meeting project cost objectives. Project Governance was identified as the most important of the six PCS elements for meeting project objectives. A lack of standard processes emerged as the most significant barrier to achieving effective project governance, while having skilled and experienced project team members was the most significant enabler for implementing earned value. Practical implications: The study offers a direction for implementing and developing PCS as a strategic tool and focuses on the PCS elements that can improve project outcomes. Originality/value: This research contributes to project management knowledge and differs from previous attempts in two ways. Firstly, it investigates the elements of PCS that are critical to achieving project scope, schedule and cost objectives; secondly, enablers and barriers of PCS success are examined to see how they influence each element independently.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: barriers; construction; enablers; engineering; maturity; project control systems; project success
Index terms: methodology, construction project, survey, project cost, empirical study, project scope, project management, project team, project control, implementation, project success, Saudi Arabia, case study, project manager, governance, regression model, project outcome
Subjects: scope management, project completion, contractual arrangements, Geography, production management, research methods, control systems, profession, data collection methods, business, project delivery, project management theory and practice, economics, statistical analysis
Topics: Project Management, Geographical Context, Procurement, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Governance
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here