Minimum energy efficiency: Is the energy performance certificate a suitable foundation?

Organ, S (2021) Minimum energy efficiency: Is the energy performance certificate a suitable foundation? International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 39(4), pp. 581-601. ISSN 2398-4708

Abstract

Purpose: Climate change is one of the most significant challenges of our time. The existing housing stock is a crucial component in achieving international and national climate change targets through energy efficiency improvements. The private rental sector incorporates some of the worst performing housing. To address this, the UK has implemented the minimum energy efficiency standard, based on the energy performance certificate rating. However, the energy performance certificate has a number of criticisms in the UK and across the EU. This viewpoints paper discusses the primary criticisms of the EPC and whether these undermine the minimum energy efficiency standard. Design/methodology/approach: This viewpoint paper draws on the recent work across academic, government and professional literature to develop a critique of the energy performance certificate and its underlying methodology as a basis on which to form the minimum energy efficiency standard. Findings: The paper concludes that based on the current form of the energy performance certificate in the UK, the minimum energy efficiency standard is likely to unfairly advantage some landlords and penalise others. This has implications for landlords, tenants and the wider housing stock. Originality/value: This paper presents a discussion of the new minimum energy efficiency standard based on the limitations of the energy performance certificate. It has implications for policymakers, researchers and practitioners in the private rental sector.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy efficiency; energy performance certificate; existing housing; minimum energy efficiency standard
Index terms: housing stock, tenant, housing, climate change, practitioner, methodology, critique, landlord, energy efficiency, energy performance certificate
Subjects: sustainability and energy, energy systems, sociology, industry analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, climate science, practitioner, research methods
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here