Gurmu, A T; Aibinu, A A and Chan, T K (2016) A study of best management practices for enhancing productivity in building projects: Construction methods perspectives. Construction Economics and Building, 16(3), pp. 1-19. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
This research investigates management practices that have the potential to enhance productivity in building projects by focusing on construction methods. In phase 1 of the study, face-to-face interviews with nineteen experts were conducted to identify the best management practices for construction methods. The qualitative data analysis reached saturation and resulted in a list of best practices for construction methods that are relevant to the local industry. The second phase used an industry-wide survey to prioritize the best practices. Accordingly, project start-up plan, traffic control plan, machinery positioning strategy, project completion plan, and dynamic site layout plan were shown to be the top five best practices for construction methods. The study also revealed that high levels of implementation of best practices are associated with low levels of project delays. The use of best practices also varied according to the project costs. There were no discernible differences between the top five best practices. The authors suggest that they should be implemented jointly to improve productivity in building projects. Contractors could use the logistic regression model developed, to predict the probability of exceeding a baseline productivity factor and, on that basis, implement corrective actions to achieve the desired level of productivity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; best management practices; construction methods; construction productivity |
| Index terms: | survey, construction method, Australia, project delay, project cost, implementation, construction productivity, productivity, strategy, face, logistic regression, low level, site layout, data analysis, management practice, best practice, interview |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, management, economics, business, Geography, project controls, psychology, measurement and scaling, building construction, operations management, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, statistical analysis, site logistics |
| Topics: | Procurement, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here