Fuentes-del-Burgo J, N-A E (2013) Do educational mismatches influence job satisfaction? In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
It is important that higher education provide students with competences that enable them to maintain their employability in the professional environment. On the other hand, research has confirmed the existence of a positive relationship between education and job satisfaction by means of wages. Education-job mismatches are also reported to have serious effects on a number of labour market outcomes. But the consequences of educational mismatches (overeducation and undereducation) on employees working as construction site managers and the defects of their higher education have not been explored yet. This paper presents an exploratory study which seeks to examine the educational mismatch experienced by building engineers working as site managers, and analyses the relationship with job satisfaction. Using an interpretive approach within the qualitative paradigm, semi-structured in-depth interviews were carried out with a total of 34 Spanish building engineers. All were asked about their higher education and about their first professional experiences managing construction sites. More than half of participants confirm that the perceived negative educational mismatch (undereducation) has a negative influence in their job satisfaction, while the rest declare there is no effect. Undereducation also generates additional negative effects such as insecurity, uncertainty, embarrassment, frustration, work overload and waste of time. In order to overcome this situation, these professionals have developed different strategies such as delegating tasks, subcontracting and participating in training courses. Early conclusions are that educational mismatches due to undereducation are an important cause of job dissatisfaction for graduates in Building Engineering. Consequently, they may negatively impact construction companies through productivity decreases of these employees.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building engineering; educational mismatch; job satisfaction; site manager; qualitative research |
| Index terms: | mismatch, labour market, site manager, qualitative research, building engineering, paradigm, competence, exploratory study, job satisfaction, construction company, higher education, productivity, engineer, subcontracting, construction site, strategy, employability, manager, interview, wages |
| Subjects: | human resources and leadership, business economics, educational institutions, personnel development, education and knowledge transfer, management, research methods, economics, work location, practitioner, data collection methods, engineering problems, profession, mechanical systems, research design and methodology, organization |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Supply Chain Management, Education, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here