Evaluation of social risks in large-scale infrastructure projects in India: A comparative study using relational and traditional approaches

Halder, A; Bhardwaj, A and Barik, G (2025) Evaluation of social risks in large-scale infrastructure projects in India: A comparative study using relational and traditional approaches. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(8), pp. 940-954. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Large-scale infrastructure projects (LSIPs) are characterized by huge costs, high complexity, a high propensity for risks, and a long-lasting impact on the environment and society. While past researchers have extensively studied project risk and associated issues, much less is explored about social risks, a particular category of risks rooted in the social contexts of the LSIPs. The gap is starker in the context of developing countries. To address this gap in knowledge, a network analysis approach is used to explore various social risks and their interdependencies in LSIPs in India. Data was collected from 23 risk management experts working in Indian LSIPs through a matrix-based questionnaire and subsequent interviews. A Social network analysis (SNA) of the social risk interactions identified labor unrest, environmental pollution, and public resistance as the most critical in LSIPs. The SNA-based risk criticality scores were also compared with the traditional probability-impact-based risk perception scores, and divergence of the results was observed. The study concludes by suggesting an actionable social-risk mitigation framework. The findings provide insights on the social risk interaction patterns and emphasize the importance of taking a relational perspective in conjunction with the traditional probability-impact-based view while assessing such risks in LSIPs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; large-scale infrastructure projects; social network analysis; social risk
Index terms: network analysis, pollution, interaction, India, infrastructure project, comparative study, risk management, social network analysis, risk perception, developing country, interview, society, risk mitigation, complexity, questionnaire
Subjects: financial risk, development economics, Geography, research methods, behavioral psychology, environmental hazards, communities and social development, research design and methodology, risk assessment, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, systems engineering, environmental health, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: International Construction, Research Practice, Cost Management, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here