Garmston H, F M and Pan W, d W P (2013) Multi-storey building retrofit with a focus on the façade selection process: A UK commercial office case study. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
Poorly-insulated existing buildings contribute significantly to the energy use of the built environment. In the UK, the existing building stock is replaced at a rate of less than 2% a year; thus, many of today’s buildings will still be in use in 2060. Retrofitting aged buildings can significantly reduce their energy use. This paper analyses the selection process and success factors in retrofit façade decision-making. Literature relating to building retrofit and façade selection is reviewed. A case study is conducted on a five-storey 1970s UK commercial office building, retrofitted in 2011. Data is collected via in-depth interviews with key project decision-makers, a documentary evidence review, and thermography of the completed retrofitted façade. The façade evolution is mapped according to seven identified project stages and the RIBA Plan of Work 2007. The retrofit satisfied the client’s aesthetic needs, while delivering an 85% reduction in the 'wall' U-value and a 'B' rated Energy Performance Certificate. Value engineering (VE) greatly influenced the façade selection, with less expensive alternatives replacing original elements of the façade design. The façade’s thermal success is linked to the VE focusing on façade elements covering only a small extent of the building. Façade success factors key to attracting tenants (lower running costs and aesthetics) may apply to commercial buildings in general. Thermography aided in assessing the retrofitted thermal envelope, but to act as a tool to aid retrofit façade selection, it should ideally involve a 'before' and 'after' survey.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision-making; façade selection; multi-storey; retrofit |
| Index terms: | plan of work, retrofitting, energy use, built environment, running cost, evidence, energy performance certificate, decision-making, commercial building, evolution, thermography, success factor, survey, tenant, building stock, value engineering, commercial office, aesthetic, case study, interview |
| Subjects: | value management, practitioner, construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, financial and cost management, environmental science, energy systems, operations management, computer vision, factor and component analysis, renovation and retrofit, infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, asset management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here