Workmanship and defects in housing in the state of Victoria, Australia

Georgiou, J (2013) Workmanship and defects in housing in the state of Victoria, Australia. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.

Abstract

The incidence of defects and the quality of housing have been the subject of extensive research internationally for decades. In the State of Victoria, Australia, various voluntary schemes have been adopted and discarded by industry-based organisations and government legislation in an attempt to improve the quality of housing. A constant source of debate has been that of acceptable standards of workmanship. In an attempt to provide defined standards for acceptable levels of workmanship, “Guide to standards and tolerances” was first published in 1990. These were purportedly introduced to cover areas not included in the building regulations and the Australian Standards. This paper reviews the evolution of these guides to standards and tolerances in the context of their impact on the incidence of defects and the quality of housing in Victoria. An extensive survey of building inspection reports over a period of two decades and two Acts of Parliament enacted specifically for the purpose of improving the quality of housing found that the incidence of defects increased significantly. The increase in the incidence of defects is analysed relative to these guides becoming more comprehensive. The findings indicate that the increase in the incidence of workmanship defects is not attributed to the level of comprehensiveness of the guides but attributed to other reasons.  These include large increase in volume of work, skill shortages and better informed consumers in respect of the building process and their rights.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: housing; building defect; workmanship; tolerance
Index terms: evolution, housing, workmanship, building process, becoming, legislation, building regulation, building defect, skill shortage, inspection, survey, Australia, Victoria
Subjects: regions and continents, professional practice, environmental science, legal systems, data collection methods, construction type, building construction, quality assurance, philosophical process, regulatory law, management, Geography, contractual condition
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Quality Management, Human Resources, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Contract Administration, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here