Framework for assessing the smart buildings intelligence degree

Affonso, E O T; Branco, R R; Guedes, A L A; Chinelli, C K; Tam, V W Y; Haddad, A N and Soares, C A P (2025) Framework for assessing the smart buildings intelligence degree. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(10), pp. 1154-1176. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Assessing the intelligence degree of smart buildings is a complex challenge that has aroused researchers' interest. In the researched literature, many indicators and factors used to assess building intelligence are generic and give rise to different interpretations. Furthermore, few studies establish criteria for measuring indicators, most of which are difficult to measure. Aiming to contribute to filling this gap, we proposed a framework for evaluating the intelligence degree of smart buildings and their systems, formed by indicators identified from extensive and detailed bibliographical research, which meets the premises of being easy to use, reducing the complexity of the evaluation process and enable a single interpretation by evaluators. The framework was organized by considering 91 indicators grouped into 11 sets relating to smart building systems, and it allows for the evaluation of the intelligence degree of four types of buildings: commercial, corporate, office, and apartment. We also propose a way to operate the framework through an electronic spreadsheet, mainly because electronic spreadsheets are commonly used and because the framework's table format was easily translatable into an electronic spreadsheet. The results showed that all indicators were assessed as relevant, corroborating the view of the researchers who published on the topic. Also, the indicators were considered most relevant for commercial buildings, followed by corporate buildings, office buildings, and apartment buildings. They also show that the respondents considered the instrument adequate.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessment; building systems; frame-work; intelligent building; intelligent indicators; smart building
Index terms: building system, office building, spreadsheet, complexity, commercial building, smart building, intelligent building, apartment building
Subjects: data science, engineering systems, systems engineering, design practice, construction type
Topics: Design Practice, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here