Salhab, D; Pourrahimian, E; Lindhard, S M and Hamzeh, F (2025) Patterns, 4D simulations, and artificial intelligence-driven insights: Redefining construction workspace management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(8): 04025099, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Workspaces in construction are more than just physical areas; they are critical resources that are shared among different crews. Inadequate planning of these spaces can have undesirable consequences, such as overlapping work areas among the crews, which can lead to conflicts that negatively impact productivity. Traditional models often fall short in providing a proper understanding of workspace needs and in establishing a variety of spatial-temporal plans to conduct the work. Recognizing the need for a more adaptive approach, this study uses a design science research methodology to present a four-dimensional (4D) simulation model that tests and analyzes different scenarios of performing activities based on patterns of movement. This study also presents a deep learning (DL) framework, combined with a space management dashboard to enhance decision making by predicting spatial conflicts and optimizing resource allocation. The simulation model demonstrates potential gains of up to 61.5% in reducing spatial conflicts. Additionally, the DL model achieved an accuracy of 98% in predicting potential conflicts, which emphasizes the role of data-driven approaches in construction management. This innovative approach highlights the role of advanced simulation and predictive modeling in understanding and optimizing workspace management, ultimately fostering more efficient construction environments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | conflict reduction; dashboard; deep learning; four-dimensional (4D) simulation; space management; spatial-temporal |
| Index terms: | 4D simulation, artificial intelligence, dashboard, resource allocation, workspace, productivity, deep learning, methodology, decision-making, design science research, movement, predictive modelling, accuracy |
| Subjects: | research methods, visualization, health behaviours and lifestyles, decision analysis, professional development, design practice, management, resource management, prediction and forecasting, data science, artificial intelligence |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here