Comparative analysis of deep-learning approaches for automatic recognition of awkward postures in construction environments through wrist-worn biosensors

Heravi, M Y; Jang, Y and Chauhan, H (2025) Comparative analysis of deep-learning approaches for automatic recognition of awkward postures in construction environments through wrist-worn biosensors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(8): 04025108, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction workers frequently face the risk of adopting awkward work postures, which can lead to work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Many existing solutions using wearable sensors suffer from intrusiveness and the need for multiple sensor attachments. This study proposes a novel method for automatic recognition of awkward postures using wristband biosensors and deep learning algorithms. Physiological data from ten subjects were collected, processed, and used to train the models. Long short-Term memory (LSTM), bidirectional long short-Term memory (Bi-LSTM), and one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) models were compared. The Bi-LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy at 95.09%, followed by the LSTM model with 91.49%, and the 1D-CNN model with 89.50%. The study also conducted a comprehensive analysis of the impact of diverse signal combinations and time windows on posture recognition, providing valuable insights. The findings expand the use of physiological signals for safety enhancement, specifically in recognizing awkward postures. This study contributes to wearable sensor-based posture recognition, ultimately enhancing the health and safety of construction workers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: awkward working postures; construction safety; deep learning algorithms; physiological signals; posture recognition
Index terms: construction worker, wearable sensor, deep learning, construction safety, window, accuracy, comparative analysis, neural network, face, health and safety
Subjects: psychology, practitioner, computer vision, health safety and environment, architectural elements, artificial intelligence, data analysis and analytics, environmental health, professional development
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here