Shen, W; Xue, J; Xiong, J; Zhai, X; Lee, S and Lu, J (2025) A social network-based approach for analyzing interproject risks in large-scale programs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(9): 04025124, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Managing risks in large-scale programs involves navigating the complexities of interrelated projects and diverse stakeholder involvement, which traditional project-level risk management approaches often fail to address. This study presents an advanced social network analysis (SNA)-based methodology for interproject risk management, incorporating a weighted network model that simultaneously considers both the number and strength of project connections. This approach's key innovation is the use of a tunable parameter, which balances the relative importance of connection strength and connection quantity, providing a more nuanced understanding of the interdependencies between projects. Based on the dimensions of project interdependence and stakeholder involvement, the proposed approach enhances program risk management efficiency by classifying risks into four categories - primary, interdependent, multistakeholder, and negligible - and suggesting tailored response strategies. The methodology is validated through an empirical case study of the Expo 2020 construction program, demonstrating its capacity to accurately detect and categorize program risks. The study's main theoretical contribution is its novel integration of SNA into program risk management, introducing weighted network models to quantify project interdependencies and stakeholder interactions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | interproject risk; program management; risk management; social network analysis |
| Index terms: | interdependence, interaction, dimension, risk management, case study, efficiency, complexity, stakeholder involvement, methodology, integration, program, social network analysis, social network, strategy, relative importance |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, research methods, sociology, organizational analysis, systems engineering, performance management, software systems, management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, participation process, risk assessment, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here