Jaskula, K; Kifokeris, D; Papadonikolaki, E and Rovas, D (2025) Blockchain-based decentralized common data environment: User requirements and conceptual framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(9): 04025112, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A common data environment (CDE) is defined as a single source of truth for all project information that facilitates continuous collaboration between stakeholders. In practice, multiple CDEs are used simultaneously, leading to a lack of data integrity, traceability, and transparency. Moreover, current centralized cloud-based CDEs are vulnerable to security risks such as data manipulation, which magnifies the lack of trust among project stakeholders. Previous studies proposing blockchain for information management focused on narrow use cases and did not encompass the whole life cycle of a built asset. This work aims to develop a framework for decentralized information management concerning all life cycle phases. First, we identify the users' needs for a CDE using desk research and an empirical approach, including semistructured interviews with industry experts. It is found that the top user requirement is integrating data scattered across multiple CDEs along the built asset's life cycle in a single source of truth. A CDE should provide an accountable and transparent record of the entire project history, integrating data from various tools utilized during the life cycle. In the final step, we propose a conceptual framework for a blockchain-based CDE where transactions from various tools used along the entire life cycle of a built asset are recorded on a blockchain linked with Inter-Planetary File Storage (IPFS) to increase the security of the files. Three illustrative use-case scenarios demonstrate the framework's applicability in the design, construction, and operation phases. The utilization of blockchain technology ensures an immutable, independent, and reliable record of all transactions, offering a comprehensive and tamper-proof history. This approach addresses gaps in previous studies and lays the foundation for establishing trustworthy product and material passports.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | blockchain; building information modeling; common data environment; construction management; information management |
| Index terms: | interview, traceability, collaboration, common data environment, project stakeholder, operation phase, built asset, conceptual framework, history, building information modelling, user requirement, whole life cycle, integrity, life cycle, blockchain, transparency |
| Subjects: | supplier oversight, project delivery, architectural and construction history, data collection methods, user-centered design, computing systems, value management, sociology, information systems, management, professional development, asset management, theoretical framing, sustainability assessment, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Project Management, Sustainability, Supply Chain Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here