Sun, B; Wu, J; You, H and Du, J (2025) Estimating belief updates in AI-driven drone controls for urban search and rescue operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(9): 04025128, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly enhanced the capabilities of autonomous systems in complex decision making within challenging built environments, particularly in urban search and rescue (USAR) operations, a critical component of postdisaster response. These operations require swift decision making to balance conflicting objectives, such as optimizing path planning while ensuring comprehensive environmental mapping. Current Explainable AI (XAI) approaches often focus on rationalizing or explaining the decision outcomes of AI agents but do not adequately address the methodologies needed to understand how AI systems adapt their belief systems based on real-time, limited local data, such as wind disturbances and obstacle distributions. This paper introduces an evidence accumulation model inspired by cognitive psychology, designed to estimate AI belief updates. Utilizing multiobjective reinforcement learning (MORL), this model trains drones in simulated urban settings characterized by dynamic wind fields. A reverse reasoning approach is then applied to interpret AI decisions using collected behavioral data and environmental observations. A comprehensive simulation study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of this model. The results demonstrate that the model effectively identifies how limited local information influences AI behavior after belief updates, offering a human cognitive analysis perspective to rationalize AI actions. This research contributes innovative methodologies for explaining the sophisticated cognitive flow of AI systems, laying the groundwork for improved human-AI alignment in postdisaster applications in urban settings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | drone; explainable artificial intelligence; human-artificial intelligence (AI) alignment; multiobjective reinforcement learning; urban search and rescue |
| Index terms: | artificial intelligence, estimate, effectiveness, built environment, reinforcement, drone, reasoning, estimating, agent, psychology, evidence, mapping, decision-making, methodology |
| Subjects: | building materials, financial and cost management, artificial intelligence, performance management, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, automation and robotics, cognitive psychology, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Risk Management, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Cost Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here