Wu, J; Yan, B; Sun, G; Liu, M; Li, Y and Zhou, C (2025) Research on the construction-forming model of a single-layer orthogonal saddle-shaped cable net with an opening. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(9): 05025008, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The single-layer orthogonal saddle cable net with an opening is an innovative structural system combining features of saddle-shaped and spoke-type cable nets. Taking the Xi'an International Football Center as a case study, this research investigates its construction formation process using a 1:10 scaled physical model and finite element simulations. Five lifting schemes and four tensioning schemes were designed and compared based on their ability to minimize unbalanced forces and ensure structural stability. Results demonstrate that synchronous lifting and tensioning of load-bearing and stabilizing cables is the optimal method, effectively reducing displacement deviations and cable force errors. Experimental validation was conducted to analyze height deviations, force redistribution, and structural behavior during lifting and tensioning stages. This study provides insights into the construction methodology of large-scale cable net structures, offering practical guidance for optimizing construction precision, ensuring structural stability, and reducing formation errors in similar projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | finite element model; forming scheme; orthogonal saddle-form cable net with opening; proportional model test; saddle-shaped cable net |
| Index terms: | deviation, case study, methodology, lifting, validation, stability, physical model |
| Subjects: | professional development, occupational health and safety management, data collection methods, financial and cost management, research methods, manufacturing engineering, structural engineering |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here