Yang, S; Zhang, J; Xu, S; Deng, T; He, Q and Wang, P (2025) Work section planning for accompanying construction of extra-long tunnel and ballastless track of mountainous high-speed railways. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(9): 04025126, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Reasonable construction methods and construction work section planning (WSP) are the key influencing factors in ensuring that the construction of extra-long railway tunnels is completed in time. This study proposes a new construction planning method for accompanying the construction of tunnel and ballastless track (AC-TBT) in high-speed railways, which allows the construction of a tunnel and ballastless track to occur with time overlaps and shortens the construction period of extra-long tunnels. To further evaluate the advantages of AC-TBT, this study first designs a deep Q-network (DQN) algorithm to find the optimal WSP scheme under dual-objective optimization for time constraints and number of construction teams limitations. Second, a construction planning model based on integer linear programming (ILP), and a Monte Carlo random sampling is established to calculate construction schedules and the number of construction teams involved in construction for different WSP schemes. Monte Carlo random sampling is used to generate safety buffer times to mitigate the impact of uncertainties in tunnel construction and is included as an important parameter in the ILP model. The results of the case study show that, compared with the conventional construction of tunnel and ballastless track, the two WSP schemes based on AC-TBT save 80 and 40 days of construction duration, respectively. The sensitivity analysis of the reward function weights shows that the weight level directly influences the DQN's decision-making tendency regarding different construction schedules and construction team allocations. Finally, DQN demonstrates a faster convergence rate and better performance compared to Q-learning.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accompanying construction of tunnel and ballastless track; deep reinforcement learning; high-speed railway; integer linear programming; work section planning |
| Index terms: | construction planning, construction team, sensitivity analysis, decision-making, tunnel construction, construction work, influencing factor, tunnel, reinforcement, sampling, case study, construction method, linear programming, buffer, duration |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, civil engineering, building construction, algorithms, financial risk, building materials, data collection methods, environmental hazards, construction planning, operations management, project delivery, project controls, decision analysis, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Construction Materials, Time Control, Site Management, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here