Huang, X; Zhang, J; Meng, X; Wang, R; Li, J; Tao, X; Yang, Z and Li, L (2025) Verifiable safety path planning: Utilizing planar analysis for improved lifting operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(9): 04025123, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Lifting feasibility analysis is crucial for ensuring the safety of lifting operations, especially in multicrane coordinated scenarios. Prior research has delved into shortest paths, smooth trajectories, fuel-efficient routes, and closed-loop control systems. However, the study of open-loop control algorithms focused on optimizing safety-first paths has been conspicuously lacking. Traditional three-dimensional (3D) space-based methods have drawbacks. They consume abundant computational resources, resulting in high-cost and time-consuming computations. Also, the complex 3D-presented results make it arduous for users to evaluate safety margins and optimization potential across diverse working conditions, even with multiple viewpoint changes. This greatly challenges the assessment of existing solutions' reliability and optimization potential, hampering their practical application. This paper presents an innovative planar analysis method for lifting feasibility. By eliminating elevation views and 3D modeling, it substantially cuts down the analysis complexity. Moreover, we introduce the first open-loop control algorithm for finding the safest path. Optimizing within a planar framework, it boosts computational efficiency and enables clear two-dimensional (2D) result visualization. This allows users to quickly identify key conditions without rotating 3D models and easily assess result feasibility and optimality, thus filling a research void. In real-world cases, the safest paths generated by our algorithm outperformed traditional shortest-path methods. The average safety margin increased by 58%, and overall safety risks decreased by 74%. This research fills multiple gaps in the field and shows excellent practicality and safety advantages, especially in high-risk multicrane coordinated lifting operations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collision judgment; lifting analysis; multi crane collaborative lifting; safest path |
| Index terms: | 3D model, judgment, efficiency, 3D modelling, working conditions, fuel-efficient, complexity, control algorithm, visualization, computation, lifting, control system |
| Subjects: | computational design, algorithms, energy systems, dispute resolution, computational methods, systems engineering, occupational health and safety management, employment law, monitoring and control, design practice, performance management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here