Impact of mandatory reporting around the world on environmental disclosure strategies in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry: A linguistic perspective

Liu, M; Luo, X and Lu, W Z (2025) Impact of mandatory reporting around the world on environmental disclosure strategies in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry: A linguistic perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(10): 04025144, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

To address information asymmetry between firms and stakeholders, there are increasing country-level efforts to mandate environmental disclosures. Despite the growing focus on the role of mandatory environmental reporting, little is known about how such requirements affect the linguistic complexity of corporate environmental disclosures. This study fills this gap by focusing on corporate environmental disclosure strategies in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry, one sector particularly sensitive to environmental concerns. Based on a staggered difference-in-differences design, this study investigates the impact of mandatory reporting on the linguistic complexity of AEC companies' environmental disclosures. Although such mandates typically do not specify how to disclose information, the results demonstrate that mandatory environmental reporting has a significant and negative impact on linguistic complexity. The interaction results suggest that the negative impact is more pronounced for firms with a higher number of independent directors on boards. The findings emphasize the significant role of mandatory environmental reporting in altering corporate disclosure strategies from a linguistic perspective, ultimately contributing to a more transparent and informative business environment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) companies; environmental disclosure; linguistic complexity; mandatory environmental reporting; readability
Index terms: environmental concern, interaction, construction industry, information asymmetry, mandate, strategy, complexity
Subjects: behavioral psychology, transaction economics, environmental issues, management, industry analysis, systems engineering, political science
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 CT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here