A taxonomy of urban façade defects and their distribution on façade components: A data-driven analysis of historical inspection reports

Shi, Z; Park, K and Ergan, S (2025) A taxonomy of urban façade defects and their distribution on façade components: A data-driven analysis of historical inspection reports. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(10): 04025152, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Well-maintained building façades are essential for public safety. Major cities across the globe have inspection programs to ensure façade safety. However, accidents caused by falling debris and complaints continuously happen and indicate a need to improve the current inspection practices. A systematic guideline is lacking to achieve comprehensive safety inspections of buildings. A challenge that exists on the path toward a systematic and comprehensive façade inspection process is the lack of availability of common and comprehensive vocabularies for the façade safety inspection domain that extends beyond material-based defects. This research defines a taxonomy of façade defects and relationships of these defects to façade component hierarchies, through natural language processing and machine learning methods employed on more than 2,500 façade inspection reports for three major façade types. Contributions of this work include the taxonomy of defect types and their applicability to façade components, forming the missing but foundational piece for enabling comprehensive inspection of building façades. The study can directly be used in practice to establish a standard inspection practice across various inspection companies and related city agencies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: façade safety inspection; machine learning; natural language processing; public safety; taxonomy development
Index terms: inspection, vocabularies, taxonomy, safety inspection, complaint, public safety, agency, machine learning, program
Subjects: artificial intelligence, knowledge organization and systems, data analysis and analytics, software systems, sociology, emergency and crisis management, conflict resolution, quality assurance
Topics: Research Practice, Information Management, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Health and Safety, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here