A measuring tool to quantify the level of gender inclusion in a construction organization

Jaiswal, A; Laishram, B and Johari, S (2025) A measuring tool to quantify the level of gender inclusion in a construction organization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(10): 04025143, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Enhancing gender inclusion is crucial in the construction organization. Recently, few studies have identified attributes enhancing gender inclusion in construction. These attributes guide the top management and policymakers in formulating policies and strategies to foster gender inclusion in the construction organization. However, how one can measure the improvement in gender inclusion by deploying the formulated policies and strategies in the organization is still an unanswered question. Therefore, this study aims to develop a framework for construction organizations to measure their level of gender inclusion. Initially, 51 measurable elements were identified and then reduced to 28 by brainstorming with the Indian construction professionals who acted as experts for this study. Subsequently, a hierarchical relationship between identified elements and consolidated attributes from previous studies was established. After that, an analytical network process (ANP) identified a sequence of measurable elements and their weights. Superdecision and geometric aggregation techniques were used to calculate the experts' global aggregated weights. Subsequently, with the help of the domain experts, a measuring survey instrument for each of the 28 elements was developed. Among 28 elements, stimulative policies, mentorship programs, and the gender pay gap were the highest, with weights of 11.5%, 9.40%, and 9.30%, respectively. The top 20 elements lay between the 1% and 10% range, and the remaining eight were below 1%. The results of this study provide a tool to quantify the gender inclusion elements and will help construction organizations measure and gauge the improvement in gender inclusion.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; construction workers; diversity; equality; gender; inclusion
Index terms: construction professional, construction worker, construction organization, program, top management, survey, strategy
Subjects: data collection methods, software systems, management, professional development, organization, practitioner
Topics: Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here