A framework for implementing integrated project delivery in architecture design firms in Egypt

Othman, A A E and Youssef, L Y W (2021) A framework for implementing integrated project delivery in architecture design firms in Egypt. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(3), pp. 721-757. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to develop a framework for implementing the integrated project delivery (IPD) approach during the design process in architecture design firms (ADFs) in Egypt. Design/methodology/approach: A research methodology consists of literature review, case studies and survey questionnaire was designed to achieve the abovementioned aim. First, literature review was used to identify and categorise the challenges of implementing IPD during the design process. Second, four case studies were analysed to investigate the values delivered to the client or missed due to the use of IPD or traditional procurement approaches, respectively. Finally, a survey questionnaire was carried out with a representative sample of ADFs in Egypt to investigate their perception towards the challenges of IPD implementation in Egypt. Based on the results of the above, the research developed a framework to facilitate the implementation of IPD in ADFs in Egypt. Findings: Through literature review, the research identified 30 challenges that hamper the implementation of IPD in ADFs. These challenges were categorised due to their nature into five groups, namely, integration, cooperation, commitment and trust challenges, knowledge, experience skills and decision-making challenges, cultural challenges, legal and contractual challenges and technical and financial challenges. Results of data analysis showed that "poor communication and spirit of collaboration between project stakeholders" was ranked the highest influential challenge as IPD is based on collaboration and trust between project participants. In addition, "lack of training and motivation in investing for using IPD" was ranked the lowest influential challenge due to the poor attention paid to training in the construction industry. Moreover, despite the benefits of IPD implementations in many countries worldwide, it is not implemented in the Egyptian context. This necessitated taking action towards developing a framework to facilitate IPD implementation in ADFs in Egypt. Research limitations/implications: The research focussed on ADFs in Egypt. Practical implications: Adopting the proposed framework developed through this research will help implementing IPD during the design process in ADFs. Originality/value: The research identified, categorised and analysed the challenges that obstruct the implementation of IPD in ADFs. The research tackled a topic that received scant attention in construction literature in the Middle East generally and Egypt in particular. In addition, this paper presented a framework to facilitate the implementation of IPD during the design process, which represents a synthesis that is novel and creative in thought and adds value to the knowledge in a manner that has not previously occurred.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architecture; architecture design firms; built environment research; challenges; client value; Egypt; integrated project delivery; management; traditional procurement
Index terms: traditional procurement, client value, case study, implementation, construction industry, Egypt, research methodology, architecture design firm, commitment, integrated project delivery, literature review, survey, motivation, Middle East, design process, data analysis, cooperation, built environment research, integration, decision-making, methodology, collaboration, project stakeholder, questionnaire
Subjects: contractual arrangements, psychology, client relations, research management, Geography, physical geography and landforms, research methods, data analysis and analytics, design methods, data collection methods, research design and methodology, business, industry analysis, organizational analysis, sociology, decision analysis, management
Topics: Risk Management, Procurement, Geographical Context, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Human Resources, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here