Radzi, A R; K.S, A; Alias, A R; Algahtany, M and Rahman, R A (2025) Modeling the factors affecting workplace well-being at construction sites: a cross-regional multigroup analysis. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(4), pp. 1087-1110. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: A good workplace well-being (WWB) has many positive impacts on individuals and organizations. Prior studies indicate that physical, psychological and social well-being factors positively influence WWB. Nevertheless, it is essential to acknowledge that these factors may exhibit variations across different regions, cultural contexts and workplace environments. Therefore, this study aims to explore and validate the relationships between physical, psychological and social well-being factors and WWB at construction sites across different regions, using Malaysia and India as case studies. Design/methodology/approach: A conceptual model was proposed between physical, psychological and social well-being factors and WWB at construction sites. Then, a questionnaire survey was developed based on the proposed model and distributed to construction industry practitioners in both countries. In total, 316 responses were collected and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and multigroup analysis. Findings: The analyses indicate that the proposed model on physical, psychological and social well-being factors and WWB at construction sites is valid. Also, the model has no significant differences between the two countries. Thus, the findings show that the physical, psychological and social well-being factors are similarly affecting WWB at construction sites in both countries. Originality/value: The originality of the study lies in its holistic and cross-regional examination of WWB at construction sites. The insights gained from this study provide evidence for promoting good health and well-being in the construction industry. Moreover, this study seeks to provide insights that transcend geographical boundaries, offering valuable implications for promoting WWB practices in construction projects worldwide.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction project management; multigroup analysis; project management; safety and health; workplace well-being |
| Index terms: | survey, confirmatory factor analysis, construction site, health and wellbeing, boundaries, practitioner, questionnaire, evidence, well-being, variation, methodology, construction project, workplace environment, case study, Malaysia, project management, modelling, construction industry, India, construction project management |
| Subjects: | property law, analytical methods, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, production management, Geography, research methods, work location, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, industry analysis, statistical analysis, sociology, contractual condition, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Site Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here