Hua Y Y, C I Y S (2013) Development of a conceptual model for organizational learning culture and innovation diffusion in construction. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
Driven by vigorous competition and continuously escalating demands of clients in construction, innovation is increasingly important for enhancing performance of contractors and designers in design, planning and management of construction projects. Instead of intra-organization innovation, innovation in construction often diffuses across inter-organization boundaries. Influenced by various organizational learning and culture, innovation diffusion may be problematic. This paper aims to develop a conceptual framework of the relationships between organizational learning culture, learning and innovation diffusion in the construction industry via systematic review. Seven learning culture variables were identified, including creating opportunity, communication, collaboration and teamwork, knowledge sharing, collective vision, connection with the environment and leader support and reward system. There are six stages of innovation diffusion, namely acquisition, decision, assimilation, transformation, exploitation and confirmation. The resulted model provides preliminary support on the propositional relationship between organizational learning culture and innovation diffusion, and that this relationship can be mediated by organization learning. The model provides researchers and practitioners a foundation for further validations by empirical studies.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | learning; innovation diffusion; organizational culture |
| Index terms: | organizational learning, practitioner, innovation diffusion, construction project, boundaries, collaboration, exploitation, organizational culture, competition, validation, transformation, teamwork, acquisition, knowledge sharing, designer, reward system, empirical study, systematic literature review, conceptual framework, construction industry |
| Subjects: | business, professional development, management, practitioner, profession, sociology, theoretical framing, research methods, property law, research evaluation and metrics, production management, market analysis, industry analysis, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Information Management, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here