Ahmed, S N; Pasquire, C and Manu, E (2022) Key factors affecting commercial actors in collaborative working within the UK construction industry. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 27(3), pp. 323-347. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: Extensive research on the importance of collaborative working (CW) and aligning stakeholders' interests in construction has been widely conducted. But often the practice of commercial actors during CW has often been overlooked, particularly within the UK setting, where scholars have lamented on the lack of industry-wide collaboration. This study aims to explore the factors affecting commercial actors in CW, specific to the UK construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: The research used a context-based approach to seek stakeholders' perspectives on the key factors affecting commercial actors in CW within the UK. Semi-structured interviews with individuals (contractors, cost consultants, designers among others) from construction and infrastructure organisations were conducted, using multiple case study investigations. The collected data was analysed using a case study approach, and principles of inductive thematic analysis to identify the key factors. Findings: Findings from the analysis identified "institutional" factors such as transactional cost economic influence, the prevailing construction model influence and professional related drivers. Key drivers within these factors include commercial background and training, custom and practice, misaligned interests in projects, clients' perception of consultants, cost-driven environment, conventional procurement protocols and bureaucratic functions. Originality/value: In conclusion, these factors continue to affect CW with undue influence on commercial actors in the UK, thus preventing performance improvement demanded by successive UK Government reports. The context-based approach applied in this study is expected to provide some insight in construction management research, especially from a commercial perspective in the UK, to gain an understanding of how these factors are manifesting.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaboration; construction; cost consultants; project delivery approach; quantity surveying; thematic analysis |
| Index terms: | project delivery, construction industry, investigation, performance improvement, economic influence, designer, case study, thematic analysis, methodology, collaboration, cost consultant, management research, surveying, interview |
| Subjects: | project delivery, health monitoring assessment and metrics, research design and methodology, data collection methods, profession, industry analysis, management, performance measurement, methods and analysis, economic analysis, research methods |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Procurement, Quality Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here