Jambol, D D; Molwus, J J and Daniel, M M (2013) Re-thinking the approaches to mass housing delivery in Nigeria. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
Nigerian cities are experiencing increasing population and rising urbanisation rates which are inconsistent with the provision of adequate housing and urban infrastructure. This contradictory trend arises mostly from the failures of past efforts by the government and the private sector. In recent times, public-private partnerships have evolved at different urban centres to produce houses which are inaccessible to the low-income households. Consequently, a substantial population of the low-income households residing in the urban areas are accessing their housing through informal arrangements which are synonymous to the sprawling of substandard housing. This problem is evidenced by the deficiency of infrastructure, shortage of good housing, unplanned urban expansion, poor living condition, high residential rentals and deprivation. To examine these issues, a review of government's mass housing schemes is undertaken. Official policy papers, reports and academic literature covering the period from 1960 to 2010 were used to explicate the mass housing schemes. The findings indicates a consistent use of top-down approach to design and implement mass housing programmes, from the Federal to State and Local government levels. This approach failed to achieve desired results due to non engagement of relevant stakeholders (governmental actors, private institutions, land owners and end-users) in the funding, design and implementation of housing projects. Similarly, roles were over-centralised in Federal Government line agencies which gave undue advantage to few individuals to monopolise the implementation processes. Furthermore, there was a lack of appropriate procurement regulations to address probity, accountability and efficiency concerns. In view of these findings, a bottom-up approach, the decentralisation of roles and partnership of multiple actors are recommended. These have potentials for solving the problems identified; therefore, further research could empirically verify this claim.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | housing; bottom-up approach; top-down approach; national policy |
| Index terms: | population, regulation, Nigeria, programme, implementation, national policy, income, urbanization, household, bottom-up approach, agency, housing project, urban infrastructure, efficiency, living condition, housing, private sector, urban area, accountability, funding, deprivation, housing delivery, land, local government, decentralization, partnership, owner |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, real estate economics, contractual arrangements, housing and residential development, performance management, social justice, liability law, political science, public policy, construction type, urban form and morphology, partnership management, urban planning, industry analysis, sociology, Geography, economic analysis, administrative law, demography, project controls |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Governance, Time Control, Geographical Context, Construction Technology, Ethics, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here