Duman, S (2003) Policy impact analysis of privatizing public services: The case of wastewater treatment in Indianapolis. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Abstract
The wave of privatization in the late 1970s spurred local government policy makers to deal with fiscal and economic pressures created by limited local resources, decreased federal grants, and a spectrum of political aspirations. They reconsidered alternative service delivery arrangements—whether local governments should remain as direct service suppliers through in-house service delivery, or service brokers and monitors through managed contracts with outside vendors. Various scholars and practitioners have investigated empirically whether privatizing public services can succeed at the local government level. However, existing studies are often inconclusive and ideologically biased. A more systematic and accurate analysis is needed to group impacts of privatization on public services. Therefore, this should be explored in a meticulous case study supported by rich, in-depth real-life qualitative research together with strong quantitative analytical techniques, in order to clarify the confusion/illusion both in the intensity of the theory-building process and practice of public service delivery arrangements. This study introduces the rationale for employing the Quasi-Experimental (Q-E) methods, including Interrupted Time Series analysis (ITS). Methodological emphasis is placed on the significance of integrating qualitative and quantitative analytical tools. This study focuses on the policy intervention of privatization in Indianapolis, Indiana, Advanced Wastewater Treatment (AWT) facilities. Cost of Operation and Management (O&M) of AWT before and after the policy intervention; and the quality of wastewater treated before and after the policy intervention have been longitudinally analyzed. Special emphasis is given to the significance of capital improvement costs because of its decisive power to affect the findings of prior research on privatization. This study reviews two rival hypotheses about the effects of privatization: (i) capital improvements rather than privatization affect desired outcomes; and (ii) precipitation affects desired outcomes. In sum, ten essential policy implications have been developed to further clarify misconceptions about privatization practice. Privatization as policy intervention did not result in sudden changes in O&M variables. The statistically delayed impact of privatization has been ruled out through testing rival hypotheses, especially capital improvement costs. The quality of wastewater treatment is improved over time but threats to validity still exist.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Dunn, W N |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building process; case study; government; local government; policy; precipitation; privatization; qualitative research; service delivery; time series |
| Index terms: | policy implication, privatization, testing, policy impact, validity, public services, service delivery, time-series analysis, case study, precipitation, building process, practitioner, qualitative research, broker, local government, time series |
| Subjects: | data science, research design and methodology, profession, data collection methods, research evaluation and metrics, administrative law, service delivery, economic analysis, professional practice, policy studies, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, climate science, building construction |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Site Management, Governance, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here