Erten, S (2008) Spatial analysis of mega-event hosting: Olympic host and Olympic bid cities. PhD thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
Abstract
The aim of this dissertation is to provide a new perspective to the analysis of megaevent / host city relationship. The significance of the research subject depends on the interest in hosting mega-events such as the Olympic Games and the World Fairs, which generate a competition among cities. Turkish cities are recently being involved in this competition. In addition to that, mega-events have large-scale and long-term impacts on the built environment, which has not been thoroughly discussed in urban studies. The methodology which is based on a qualitative analysis comprises three steps: a historical analysis made on the Olympic host cities, and two case studies. The first case is Athens as the 2004 Olympic city, the second case is Istanbul as an Olympic bid city since 1990. This study recognizes but qualifies the concept of megaevent hosting. It is shown that mega-event hosting is a capacity-building process, whilst it has a potential to generate overdose investments problem in the built environment. The most significant conclusion of the study is that the ability of coping with this problem is correlated with the ability of absorbing the investments made.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Tekeli, İ |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building process; built environment; case studies; competition; games; qualitative analysis |
| Index terms: | qualitative analysis, competition, methodology, Istanbul, Olympic Games, building process, built environment, coping, dissertation, case study |
| Subjects: | research dissemination and communication, market analysis, building construction, behavioral psychology, research methods, Geography, data collection methods, research design and methodology, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here