Eufrasio Espinosa, R M (2015) A visio-spatial life cycle energy model of building materials within a bioregional context: Mapping the embodied energy of fired clay bricks in Cuitzeo, Mexico. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, UK.
Abstract
Despite the general acceptance of Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) to tackle environmental problems associated with the built environment, the literature shows that this complex assessment system presents limitations as a communication tool for decision-making process given that results are difficult to interpret. By trying to reduce the complexity of following multiple variables in LCA, a simplified and more straightforward process emerged to account for only energy using, Life cycle Energy Analysis (LCEA). However, LCEA has also inherited problems associated with LCA. Thus, discrepancies in calculation procedures, the lack of geographical considerations and ecological attitude and assumptions are criticized in both approaches. In this thesis, a Visio-Spatial Life Cycle Energy Model based on Geographical Information Systems (GIS) was developed in order to bridge the gap of LCEA as a communication tool by displaying embodied energy intensities in thematic maps taking into consideration bioregional principles in its analysis. A new dynamic Input-Output model, which efficiently simplifies the extraction process of energy paths from IO tables enabled the integration of hybrid energy coefficients to account for economic establishments dedicated to produce goods and services in the construction sector as illustrated in a bioregional case study area in Mexico. The full capability of the Visio-spatial energy model was then applied to a specific study of fired clay brick production within the bioregion. The results obtained by process analysis methods (PA) had a variation of 33. 6% with respect to IO procedures, which can be considered acceptable in hybrid methods. Embodied energy figures expressed in thematic maps helped to reduce geographical assumptions and expand the sense of place in LCEA by visualizing patterns in manufacturing processes within the case study area.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Mexico; bridge; built environment; case study; communication; complexity; energy analysis; integration; life cycle; manufacturing; process analysis |
| Index terms: | embodied energy, energy analysis, built environment, building material, process analysis, manufacturing process, life cycle, decision-making process, energy model, case study, complexity, information system, life cycle energy, construction sector, variation, mapping, integration, Mexico, calculation procedure, life cycle assessment, maps |
| Subjects: | engineering analysis, Geography, spatial and geospatial analysis, manufacturing engineering, environmental impact, information systems, systems engineering, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, measurement and scaling, decision analysis, organizational analysis, contractual condition, management, energy systems, building materials, value management, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here