The turnover dynamics of residential buildings

Feiruzi, A (2024) The turnover dynamics of residential buildings. PhD thesis, Lancaster University, UK.

Abstract

The construction and operation of buildings is one of the most resource-intensive elements of the economy, therefore buildings are a central focus of efforts to reduce energy use and hence greenhouse gas emissions. Because of their long- lasting nature, buildings are also important factors in deciding the inertia of economies, and determining the turning point of economies in net-zero transitions. Traditionally buildings are assigned single representative timescales of the order of 80 years. However, building investments may be seen as investments in components, each having its own service life ranging from seconds to centuries, with returns expected over this interval. The aim of this thesis is to explore the relationship between investments in buildings and their turnover timescales, which I refer to as the investment-timescale distribution, and to identify its role in the capital inertia of the building sector in the climate transition. In chapter 2, this investment-timescale distribution is first developed for a single building using the financial costs of components and their expected service life. >This is then extended to a representative building (RB) by applying a well- established mortality function for the service life of each component. The resulting investment-timescale distribution of an RB is a near continuous yet multi-modal distribution with a first moment of 38 years, remarkably close to the expected working lifetime of its inhabitants. I explore the implication of this investment-timescale distribution in chapter 3, in particular for the dynamic maintenance schedule and economic performance of an RB in the UK. This is done by simulating maintenance costs to counter the depreciation of components as they approach their performance thresholds. I evaluate the performance of this simulation using return on investment (ROI). The result is a near stochastic maintenance schedule despite the deterministic nature of the simulation. This provides a strong indication as to why the interaction of timescale spectra with maintenance thresholds yields the complex and hard to predict maintenance dynamics we see in real property portfolios. Finally, in chapter 4, I apply the investment-timescale dynamics to simulate the dynamics of energy demands and carbon liabilities of an RB. This simulation contrasts these dynamics under a net-zero carbon policy and a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. The results show that, for new build, the longer-lived (>70 years) carbon-intensive components avoid much of their maintenance carbon liability if the economy decarbonizes in the interim. This also suggests that delaying currently carbon intensive construction until less carbon intensive options are developed should be considered during the transition to net-zero.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Jarvis, A and Szerszynski, B
Uncontrolled Keywords: UK; energy use; investment; liability; new build; policy; residential; service life; simulation
Index terms: liability, energy use, option, maintenance cost, energy demand, residential building, dynamics, turnover, interaction, new build, greenhouse gas emission, return on investment, building investment, service life, mortality
Subjects: financial management, energy systems, liability law, systems engineering, asset management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, decision analysis, environmental health, economic analysis, behavioral psychology, construction integration, construction type, business management
Topics: Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here