Feldmann, F G (2022) Novel perspectives on sustainable value creation: Challenging the status quo by implementing advanced technologies into supply chain processes. PhD thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg, Germany.
Abstract
Driven by far-reaching global developments such as climate change, resource scarcity, and demographic change, the creation of business value has been shifting away from merely economic metrics. Instead, to stay competitive, firms are increasingly encouraged to develop sustainable strategies that simultaneously provide economic, environmental, and social benefits – the so-called Triple Bottom Line of sustainability. As an extension of the widely accepted conceptual framework of the natural-resource-based view (NRBV), linking environmental sustainability to gaining a competitive advantage, clean technology strategies have been regarded as one of the cornerstones of a firm’s contribution to sustainable development. This dissertation, compromising four essays with distinct qualitative and quantitative methodological approaches, contributes to the understanding of the process by which firms competitively position themselves in uncertain future environments by pursuing clean technology strategies. To cover a wide spectrum of theoretical and practical applications, the essays examine firms’ respective approaches towards sustainable development from various stakeholder perspectives along the supply chain in addition to two deep dives into distinctive industries (i. e. , construction and e-commerce). Thereby, this dissertation strengthens the theoretical basis of various research fields in the context of a firm’s sustainable development and provides essential guidance for practitioners aspiring to implement clean technology strategies while gaining or sustaining a competitive advantage. The first essay, “Exploring barriers towards modular construction – A developer perspective using fuzzy DEMATEL”, examines the adoption of a more sustainable construction method from the perspective of key decision-makers in the construction supply chain. In contrast to conventional construction approaches, modular construction (MC) industrializes the building process by shifting the vast majority of operations to a controlled factory environment. With prefabrication levels of up to ninety percent, MC offers a wide range of benefits: reduction of waste and energy consumption, higher quality, reduced lead times, and better working conditions. This is why it can be regarded as a clean technology allowing firms and the entire industry to develop sustainably. However, the adoption of this approach by housing corporations and developers remains relatively low. Therefore, based on a literature review, the barriers to wider adoption are identified and subsequently evaluated by industry experts regarding their influences on each other by applying the fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method. The results provide in-depth insights into the relationships of barriers impeding a further uptake of MC and emphasize the factors that should be given the most attention by practitioners and researchers to promote this cleaner production approach. The second article, “Towards lean automation in construction – Exploring barriers to implementing automation in prefabrication”, focuses on the further improvement of the aforementioned clean technology from the perspective of MC manufacturing firms. While high levels of prefabrication yield a considerable number of advantages concerning sustainable development, recent research showed that current production operations can be regarded as a mere shift from on-site to off-site craftsmanship.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Hartmann, E and Fifka, M S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; building process; climate change; commerce; competitive advantage; construction method; construction supply chain; developer; e-commerce; energy consumption; manufacturing; modular construction; prefabrication; resource-based view; stakeholder; sustainability; sustainable construction; sustainable development; working conditions |
| Index terms: | supply chain process, construction method, clean technology, strategy, literature review, sustainable development, resource-based view, social benefit, sustainable construction, laboratory, environmental sustainability, housing, climate change, building process, conceptual framework, value creation, practitioner, decision-making, modular construction, e-commerce, competitive advantage, automation, dissertation, working conditions, prefabrication, construction supply chain, commerce, lead time, energy consumption |
| Subjects: | employment law, management, decision analysis, project controls, supply chain performance, construction logistics, energy systems, data analysis and analytics, sustainable construction, sustainable design, health safety and environment, automation and robotics, economic development, theoretical framing, research management, asset management, building construction, market analysis, practitioner, climate science, construction type, research dissemination and communication, digital commerce |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Supply Chain Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here