Fosu, R (2017) Decision making processes for BIM software selection in the U.S. A.E.C. Industry: Developing a unified, streamlined framework. PhD thesis, Purdue University, USA.
Abstract
The use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) techniques and tools continues to gain popularity in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry as more companies in the various sectors are utilizing it in one form or another. In this research, the decision-making process of construction firms with respect to the selection of BIM software for use is investigated. Through one on one interviews and gathered survey responses, a framework mapping out the various paths the exist in the decision-making process are explored. This data is then used to form a framework for BIM software selection in the construction sector of the AEC industry in the United States.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Connolly, P |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | United States; building information modeling; construction firms; decision making |
| Index terms: | building information modelling, decision-making process, decision-making, mapping, construction sector, United States, interview, construction firm, survey |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, industry analysis, information systems, data collection methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, Geography, organization |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here