Halpin, J E (1999) The impact of out-of-town stores on local wildlife habitats. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, UK.
Abstract
A study was undertaken to identify the environmental impacts of out-of-town retail warehouses on wildlife habitats, using the B&Q chain of do-it-yourself retail outlets as a sample population. A database was created containing details of the B&Q stores, which revealed their location, characteristics, and the nature of adjacent habitats which may be affected by their presence. It was discovered that the majority of the 284 warehouses had been constructed at out-of-centre or out-of-town locations, and predominantly on land which had been previously developed. Approximately 75% of the stores were surrounded by urban habitat, although 17% were situated adjacent to rivers or canals. Impacts on local wildlife habitats were monitored throughout the construction process at three stores on brownfield and greenfield sites. Problems were discovered with the lack of site investigation, poor landscape design and the careless protection of natural features. The landscaping at B&Q stores was assessed for wildlife value, using birds as an indicator species. Landscaping was biased towards the planting of non-vegetation, with low species or structural diversity. Birds appeared to generally avoid the central planting areas, with greater numbers and diversity seen in the peripheral vegetation. Birds particularly favoured tall trees and native species seemed to attract a higher diversity of bird species. A high percentage of B&Q outlets (17%) were situated close to rivers or canals, with drainage from the store entering the water systems directly or via interceptor tanks. Accordingly, an investigation was carried out to establish the effect on aquatic wildlife of run-off from car park areas. Chemical testing for heavy metal content of water and sediment samples indicated localised pollution. Biological monitoring of macroinvertebrates suggested a reduction in quality at the outfall, although the effect again appeared localised and variable. Recommendations are detailed for the avoidance or mitigation of the impact identified through this study.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | canals; drainage; monitoring; pollution; population; site investigation |
| Index terms: | urban habitat, canal, environmental impact, mitigation, population, construction process, do-it-yourself, drainage, pollution, database, car park, investigation, presence, site investigation, monitoring, landscape design, metal, land, testing |
| Subjects: | environmental impact, professional practice, environmental science, financial risk, demography, building construction, urban sustainability, control systems, data collection methods, real estate economics, design practice, traditional and composite building materials, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental health, data management, geotechnical engineering |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Site Management, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here