Building bridges: A study of coordination in projects

Hemphill, L M (2009) Building bridges: A study of coordination in projects. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, USA.

Abstract

In our efforts to understand how collaborative work can be accomplished, we often turn to discussions of “coordination” for help. However, the concept of coordination is inadequate for explaining the many interdependent processes at work within successful collaborations. In this dissertation, I examined a collaborative construction project—the Woods Avenue Bridge (WAB) Project—with many coordination demands. I used data from this project to develop the concept of adaptive capacity—the set of capabilities a team develops that enable them to adjust to internal and external stresses. Through analyzing meeting minutes, interview transcripts, and documents the project team developed, I was able to identify behaviors and approaches the team took that may have enabled them to better respond to changes in their environment. I use a specific example of a time when the team successfully redesigned the structure they were building in the field to illustrate the kind of coordination work adaptive capacity enables. From data about the WAB Project, I identified components of adaptive capacity including perspective taking, multimembership, affect, and social capital. Understanding these components and the adaptive capacity they can develop helps us understand what about a team enables them to accomplish coordination work. Without adaptive capacity, we lack an integrated explanation of the ways in which different components interact and how those components address coordination. This dissertation contributes to our understanding of how collaborative teams accomplish coordination by refining the concept of adaptive capacity and integrating earlier literatures on coordination, collaboration, and adaptation. The concept of adaptive capacity helps us understand the resources collaborative teams develop that make it possible for them to find flexible and creative solutions to their coordination problems.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Teasley, S D
Uncontrolled Keywords: bridge; collaboration; coordination; interview; project team
Index terms: collaboration, construction project, documents, interview, social capital, dissertation, coordination, project team, wood, adaptive capacity, adaptation
Subjects: project delivery, data collection methods, sociology, management, traditional and composite building materials, professional development, research dissemination and communication, user focus, production management, urban design
Topics: Sustainability, Project Management, Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here