Hintson, J (2025) State expansion and hollowness in contemporary Africa. PhD thesis, Stanford University, California, USA.
Abstract
Many observers and scholars of African politics contend that states keep services and infrastructure sparse in their rural peripheries, especially in regions outside of leaders' co-ethnic bases of support. But is this still true in the 21st Century? If not, why not, and to what extent has this expansion been meaningful for rural citizens seeking substantive services from the state? This dissertation addresses these questions with a variety of original data sources. Chapter 1 frames the key research questions of this dissertation. Chapter 2 presents new data from terabytes of satellite imagery to demonstrate that, contrary to many long-held expectations, nearly all African governments have been significantly expanding basic service delivery infrastructure into their historically neglected rural communities. They have done this, by and large, without favoring regions home to state leaders' co-ethnics. Chapters 3 and 4 then home in on the political economy of state expansion in one African country, Uganda. Chapter 3 demonstrates that the Ugandan government led by President Yoweri Museveni has engaged in the hollow expansion of public infrastructure, building facilities into rural areas while providing them with very few staff or supplies. I explain this puzzling phenomenon by arguing that Uganda has engaged in a kleptocratic path of state expansion, proliferating public facilities as a means of extracting rents in collusion with private construction firms and subsequently neglecting their operations. Leaders extract excess rents from the country's marginalized periphery, as I demonstrate with an original survey of local monitors at recent development project construction sites. In Chapter 4, I use an original survey, with two survey experiments, to show that the Ugandan government sustains this strategy of hollow expansion by successfully diverting blame for staff and supply shortages onto local middlemen. The local, petty corruption in hollow states enables kleptocracy by providing state leaders with political cover. Chapter 5 charts a course for evaluating alternate pathways to the equitable expansion of public services. Together, these chapters offer new insights on the expansion of the state into peripheral communities, the distributive politics of public goods provision, and barriers to political accountability in low- and middle-income countries.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Laitin, D and Weinstein, J |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Uganda; accountability; collusion; construction firms; corruption; government; income; political economy; politics; public infrastructure; service delivery |
| Index terms: | political economy, public infrastructure, public services, public good, Uganda, shortages, rural area, dissertation, corruption, construction firm, experiment, service delivery, construction site, survey, collusion, income, Africa, strategy, accountability, politics, satellite |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, economic and policy analysis, management, regions and continents, professional ethics, administrative law, tendering, land use and regional development, Geography, organization, service delivery, networking, political science, infrastructure and transport systems, work location, research dissemination and communication, liability law, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Site Management, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Procurement, Governance, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here