Holden, M A (2022) The digital historic structure report (DHSR): Modern construction management for cultural heritage preservation. PhD thesis, University of Florida, USA.
Abstract
Preservation professionals have been documenting cultural heritage since the height of the Renaissance when Raphael petitioned Pope Leo X to commission him to record for posterity buildings being ravaged of materials for the building boom of Rome in the 15th century. Documentation methods have evolved over the centuries to arrive at our 21st century practices of employing technology beyond the considerable imaginations of those venerable Romans. Modern preservation practice documents historic structures using a tool known as an Historic Structures Report (HSR). HSRs set forth the evolutionary history of a structure, its current existing conditions, and a preservation philosophy which dictates preservation efforts. In the digital age, information is key to the success of all industry. The construction industry has capitalized on information with the assimilation of Building Information Modeling (BIM) into work processes during the design, construction, and management of modern buildings. BIM has gained some acceptance in the cultural heritage preservation sector. With adaptations to accommodate challenges presented by historic structures it has become Historic Building Information Modeling (HBIM). However, HBIM has yet to become widely integrated with preservation practice. This research investigates a path which shows promise for increased acceptance of the technology. By combining an HSR and an HBIM to create a Digital Historic Structures Report (DHSR), this research sought to gauge the response of preservation professionals to this new digital tool. The research design employed a qualitative phenomenological approach to gather data provided from semi-structured interviews of participants asked to review DHSRs created for structures on the site. The data showed enthusiasm amongst the participants for the technology. The participants were engaged during the review process and many of them imagined creative ways to utilize the DHSR within their discipline. Analysis of the data indicated acceptance of the technology as the participants experiences were illuminated by themes of usefulness, accessible, value, and awareness. These themes found in the data show undoubtedly that an HSR reimagined as a DHSR using an HBIM platform could aid the acceptance of this technology by evolving a traditional beloved tool into an exciting new tool for 21st century preservation.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Issa, R R |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; documentation; heritage; philosophy |
| Index terms: | adaptation, information modelling, Rome, research design, platform, building information modelling, construction industry, philosophy, documentation, historic building, interview, history, documents |
| Subjects: | digital design, Geography, user focus, construction type, professional development, information systems, philosophical studies, industry analysis, research design and methodology, data collection methods, architectural and construction history |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here