Holmes, Matthew Ian (2013) The application of structural contingency theory to supply chain management: Developing a strategic model for prefabricated timber systems. PhD thesis, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
There is currently limited market penetration for prefabricated timber structural systems in non-residential multi-storey construction in Australia and New Zealand. This limited penetration is caused in part by a fragmented supply chain. There is a need for manufacturers, fabricators and designers to align themselves to better meet the needs and expectations of the non-residential construction environment. There is limited literature available on the impact of the supply chain on other Engineered-To-Order (ETO) products and there is a gap in knowledge on how the supply chain impacts on the performance of prefabricated timber systems. The manufacturer in the prefabricated timber supply chain is the key figure preventing the entire supply chain being structured to better meet the needs of the end user. The prefabricated timber construction supply chain is not structured with the end user in mind, thus decreasing its value. The prefabricated timber supply chain in its entirety should be structured for the non-residential market to better suit the needs of the customer rather than the supplier. Structural contingency theory outlines there should be a fit between the organisational processes and the environment. It states that company models that match the environmental requirements should perform more successfully than those that do not. When applying structural contingency theory to the supply chain the individual dimensions of supply chain should be aligned in order to achieve the best performance. Case studies interviews were undertaken with industry practitioners and senior leaders from organisations along the supply chain for prefabricated timber systems in Australia, New Zealand (NZ), United Kingdom (UK), Austria, Germany and Finland. These were undertaken to establish how and why the supply chain and organisations along it impact on the performance of prefabricated timber systems. These interviews together with current state-or-art of literature formed the basis of the preliminary supply chain model. Building case studies were then undertaken to further clarify these issues and test structural contingency theory, with the supply chain as the environment, the theory was tested using prefabricated timber systems.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ding, G |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; Austria; Finland; Germany; New Zealand; UK; United Kingdom; case studies; construction supply chain; contingency; engineered-to-order; market; multi-storey; residential; supplier; supply chain management; timber |
| Index terms: | case study, practitioner, interview, dimension, Australia, contingency theory, New Zealand, residential construction, timber construction, Germany, Austria, designer, construction supply chain, penetration, United Kingdom, end user, Finland, engineer-to-order, manufacturer |
| Subjects: | manufacturing engineering, design practice, health monitoring assessment and metrics, market analysis, stakeholder, sociology, practitioner, construction logistics, profession, data collection methods, construction integration, Geography |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Supply Chain Management, Research Practice, Design Practice, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here