Justelien III, A J (2009) Factors that influence course completion of individuals enrolled in craft-training courses offered by a large organization of member construction companies. PhD thesis, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, USA.
Abstract
The construction industry is one of the largest providers of jobs in the United States. Between 2009 and 2013, approximately 20% of the 7. 7 million Americans employed in construction related jobs (Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), 2009) would be eligible to retire. The industrial construction industry must attract, train, and retain a significant number of people to the construction industry. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the influence of selected personal demographic characteristics and academic behaviors of individuals participating in craft training courses offered by a large organization of member construction companies who successfully completed or left the construction training courses prior to its completion. The study used descriptive, comparative, and discriminant analytical statistical procedures to achieve the primary purpose. The population was defined as adult students who were enrolled in craft-training courses offered by one large organization of member construction companies during the 2008 Fall semester. Data was transferred from the training provider into a researcher design spreadsheet for analysis. The descriptive analysis found 96. 6% of the respondents were male and 74. 8% respondents were classified as non-metropolitan residents. Welding and Electrical crafts had the largest numbers of students enrolled. The comparative analyses found that crafts, craft levels, attendance, and grades tended to be related to course completion rates. Due to the findings that not all courses awarded grades, two discriminant analyses were used to identify substantively and statistically significant models that increased the researcher’s ability to explain the completion status of students enrolled in the craft training courses. The discriminant model for graded courses correctly classified 89. 4% of the original grouped cases (completers and non-completers), which was a 64. 8% improvement over chance. The discriminant model for non-graded courses correctly classified 83. 0% of the original grouped cases (completers and non-completers), which was a 66. 03% improvement over chance. The variable attendance had the greatest impact in both models. Since attendance was found to be related to completion status, the researcher recommended further studies on determining why students were absent from classes. Additionally the researcher recommends reviewing other possible variables that may influence students’ completion status.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Burnett, M F |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | United States; crafts; population; training |
| Index terms: | construction industry, United States, economic indicator, spreadsheet, industrial construction, construction company, population, comparative analysis, discriminant analysis |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, data science, organization, building construction, data analysis and analytics, Geography, statistical analysis, demography |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here