Kartam, N A-F (1989) Investigating the utility of artificial intelligence techniques for automatic generation of construction project plans. PhD thesis, Stanford University, USA.
Abstract
Project planning involves the definition of those project activities and their sequential relationships that are required to complete a project. In this definition, a project plan includes all of the method-related, but not the resource-related, sequencing constraints. Network-based project scheduling techniques, invented during the late 1950's, have become indispensable as aids in scheduling construction projects, especially after being computerized. However, traditional network-based techniques can help only in analyzing a plan, not in generating it. The definition of activities and their predecessors must be provided to such systems by a human planner. Because of this, plan generation has been a challenging area of research for artificial intelligence (AI) researchers since the 1960's. This thesis explores the utility of artificial intelligence techniques for automating the generation of construction project plans. First, we establish a set of criteria to be used in evaluating existing AI planners. Second, we describe the characteristics while meeting most of the evaluation criteria. We show that SIPE (System for Interactive Planning and Execution monitoring) is the most suitable of the existing AI planning systems for our purposes. Third, we present an experimental implementation of SIPE for planning construction projects with various degrees of activity repetition and across different abstraction levels. In this experimental implementation, we explore several planning issues relevant to the construction domain such as planning at multiple hierarchial abstraction levels, planning with uncertainty, planning repeated cycles of operation, and resolving interaction among activities in parallel branches of a plan. This experimental implementation aids in identifying both the power and some key limitations of SIPE in planning construction projects. Finally, we describe how SIPE has been extended to overcome these limitations, and demonstrate how the extended SIPE planning system can produce correct plans for a range of project planning applications.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Levitt, R E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial intelligence; monitoring; project planning; scheduling; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | project planning, construction project, scheduling, project scheduling, interaction, implementation, artificial intelligence, monitoring, planner |
| Subjects: | operations research, contractual arrangements, production management, behavioral psychology, profession, control systems, artificial intelligence, project controls |
| Topics: | Project Management, Procurement, Digital Applications, Time Control, Site Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here