Oliomogbe G O, S N J (2013) Does the deployment of project management itself provide benefits? Both tangible and intangible. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
In the project management literature, it has been argued that value encompasses more than the iron triangle especially as value means different things to different stakeholders along the continuum from project lifecycle to product lifecycle. However, examination of the extant literature on project management suggests that when value is discussed, it is usually considered in terms of the benefits of the project outcome. More recently, the additional value derived from deploying project management (management of projects) methodology itself has been recognised. By identifying the benefits from project management deployment and applying an intangibility test, intangible benefits were identified to be types of Organisational, Human and Social capital. The value derived from project management deployment itself can therefore be subdivided into tangible and intangible benefits; where the intangible benefit contributes to organisational competitiveness and human intellectual capital. The authors have also found that whilst organisations have an understanding of the tangible value of managing work by projects, there is a lack of recognition of the intangible value derived from undertaking the project management process itself.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | intangible benefit; project management; value |
| Index terms: | project lifecycle, project outcome, social capital, project management process, methodology, competitiveness, lifecycle, project management |
| Subjects: | project completion, project delivery, research methods, project management theory and practice, sociology, market analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here