Keirouz, W T (1988) Domain modeling of constructed facilities for robotic applications. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
Abstract
The introduction of robotics to construction represents one possible solution to some of the productivity and quality control problems facing the construction industry. Construction robots performing operations and maintenance functions in a constructed facility must possess knowledge about and a description of the facility in which they operate. This information about the facility is organized into a domain model of the operating environment. The controller of a robot uses the domain model to plan and carry out robotic actions. This work identifies and investigates issues in the domain modeling of constructed facilities for robotic applications by developing and evaluating a domain modeling system. Model requirements regarding model contents and functionality are first identified and used to develop a model architecture. The domain model must contain both descriptive and functional information about the facility it represents; it must also provide multiple abstract views of the environment in support of planning activities. The architecture organizes the model as a hierarchy of objects obtained through a spatial decomposition of the domain, and uses a network representation to model decomposed objects. Nodes in the network can be either primitive or domain objects. Primitive objects represent non-decomposable physical entities. Domain objects represent aggregate objects and can be recursively decomposed into subobjects: either domain or primitive objects. Connection objects are the branches in the network decomposition of a domain object and represent the functionality of relationships between the subobjects of a domain object. Furthermore, the model architecture uses an object-centered approach to organize and integrate all the information about a domain entity in the model object representing the entity. Modeling situations are used to investigate the limits of the modeling capabilities of the architecture and to identify additional issues that were not addressed when the architecture was developed. Solutions to these issues are generated and their impact on the model structure is used to evaluate the model architecture and to recommend extensions of this work.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | productivity; quality control; robotic |
| Index terms: | aggregate, productivity, construction industry, quality control, modelling, robotics, functionality |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, management, project delivery, automation and robotics, analytical methods, design features, materials science |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here