Lizarralde, G (2004) Organisational system and performance of post-disaster reconstruction projects. PhD thesis, Universite de Montreal, Canada.
Abstract
Due to the major shortcomings frequently found in post-disaster reconstruction projects, practitioners and academics agree that important improvements are required in order to help affected families recover and to optimise the use of available resources. As the number and impact of natural disasters increase every year, the performance of reconstruction projects is increasingly a major concern for various disciplines in both developing and developed countries. However, the efforts to improve the performance of these projects (mostly for developing countries) have been obsessively concentrated on arguing for the importance of community participation (particularly in construction activities, through self-help programs) and on the importance of using local resources and technologies while rejecting the use of imported and foreign solutions. This study demonstrates that, very often, organisations working in post-disaster reconstruction in fact act strategically, both as promoters and builders of the initiatives. Consequently, they are in a situation where the projects are (or should be) less influenced by the tactical decisions made in regard to the actual building process (e. g. on the role of builder) and more by the organisational system adopted for the project and by the influence of the broader environment on the activities of promotion. Building up on this hypothesis and within the framework of qualitative research, four reconstruction projects are analysed in detail and are compared with other cases reported in the literature. After responding to the challenge of determining the performance of the projects (and for this a method of evaluation has been expressly developed), the research identifies important organisational decisions that can greatly contribute to improve the way we help affected communities recover after natural disasters.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | builder; building process; construction activities; developing countries; participation; qualitative research |
| Index terms: | promotion, reconstruction, construction activity, post-disaster reconstruction, developing and developed country, developing country, natural disaster, builder, community participation, post-disaster reconstruction project, practitioner, program, qualitative research, promoter, building process |
| Subjects: | construction operations, practitioner, environmental hazards, building construction, development economics, economic development, participation process, research design and methodology, sociology, software systems, post-disaster and reconstruction, management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, International Construction, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here