McKeever, T M (2018) How do the perceptions of wages, benefits, and working conditions differ among unionized mechanical construction workers in right-to-work and non-right-to-work states. PhD thesis, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
This qualitative study seeks to better understand how union member’s perceptions of wages, benefits, and working conditions differ from those living and working in a Right-to-Work state and those in a Non-Right-to-Work state. Union workers from the mechanical construction industry in the Right-to-Work states of Nebraska, Nevada, and Texas, the Non-Right-to-Work states of Colorado, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, and the recently Right-to-Work transitioned stated of West Virginia provide the data and setting for this study. One-on-one semi-structured interviews with Business Managers of United Association of Plumbers and Pipe-Fitters unions located within these seven states, along with focus group sessions with union members in each state, were conducted over a four-month period. The research identified the following themes through study participant responses; Wage Satisfaction and Benefits, Employee and Employer Relationship: Worker Appreciation and Feedback, Work Environment and Job Site Safety, Anti-Union Sentiment, Implication of Right-to-Work, Being a Union Member in a Right-to-Work State, and Concerns for the Future. Study findings confirm that union workers in Right-to-Work states perceive their wage as low, but their perception is influenced by how successful they think company owners are through the purchases they make, such as nice homes, vehicles, and vacations. Participants in Right-to-Work states experience a high degree of anti-union sentiment on job-sites and among the general public. A finding of particular interest is union workers in Right-to-Work states have formed a sincere appreciation for being a union member knowing how difficult it is because of the legislation being in place and the anti-union sentiment within their state. This study is applicable to any union within the United States and can provide insight to employers in regards to how union workers perceive their workplace. State government representatives, that are considering passing Right-to-Work legislation, can gain insight to how the legislation may impact their state’s employers and workers.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Korns, M T |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | United States; employee; employer; feedback; focus group; government; homes; legislation; safety; wages; working conditions |
| Index terms: | owner, qualitative study, satisfaction, construction industry, construction worker, working conditions, work environment, focus group, United States, manager, wages, interview, legislation, plumber |
| Subjects: | project delivery, data collection methods, research design and methodology, industry analysis, sociology, employment law, management, legal systems, practitioner, business economics, Geography |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Project Management, Geographical Context, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here