McKiernan, P (1980) Corporate planning in small companies in United Kingdom manufacturing industry. PhD thesis, University of Surrey, UK.
Abstract
It is pleasing to find small firms at the heart of contemporary economic and political discussion. This research helps to illuminate their role in the industrial economy by examining their potential to organize their resources more efficiently and think ahead in a formal and systematic manner via the vehicle of corporate planning. The research incorporates a cross-sectional analysis of 1494 small firms in U. K. manufacturing industry, including a sub-sample of 120 firms from the Construction sector. Using a mail survey questionnaire, data was collected from each firm on company type, ownership, management structure, market structure, internal financial operation and planning activity. In order to identify those characteristics associated with companies planning ahead formally and those planning informally, the data was subjected, to two and three way crosstabulations with elaboration where necessary. A more rigorous analysis, using the Automatic Interaction Detector, was then performed on the data to substantiate the findings of the initial analysis and clarify the relationships when necessary. The results show, among other things, that some form of formal planning exists in U. K. small firms, but this is largely restricted to larger small firms and subsidiary companies.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | United Kingdom; corporate planning; manufacturing; market; ownership |
| Index terms: | survey, United Kingdom, manufacturing industry, questionnaire, corporate planning, construction sector, ownership, heart, interaction |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, business, industry analysis, economics, behavioral psychology, Geography, medical science and clinical practice |
| Topics: | Governance, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here