McLoud, M (1988) Craftsmen and entrepreneurs: Builders in late nineteenth-century Washington, D.C. PhD thesis, George Washington University, USA.
Abstract
While there have been studies of the development of specific cities and general surveys of the industrialization of building in America, no one has undertaken a systematic analysis of who designed, financed, and constructed the building in a 19th-century American city. In order to do so, this study focuses on the builders of 19th-century Washington, using municipal building permits to identify these men and illuminate their roles. The careers of individual builders are also examined. It was found that men who had been trained and had worked as building tradesmen were responsible for most of the building constructed in the city throughout the 19th century. Many building tradesmen continued to work for themselves and not for speculative owners, and thus continued not only to design and erect but also to finance a substantial number of buildings. While it has been asserted that tradesmen were replaced by entrepreneurs, this generalization does not hold true for Washington. Historically, one stage of building did not replace another. Rather, building entrepreneurs appeared and coexisted with an earlier tradition. Although industrialization of the building process was uneven and varied between locales, the essential changes documented in other cities and towns occurred in Washington as well. Businesses with large numbers of employees and access to great amounts of capital appeared, and competition between builders grew intense. While building tradesmen as a group were responsible for most of the buildings, individual craftsmen did not stay in business long enough to build many units, as they generally could not survive the competition of large-scale enterpreneurs and speculators. Although at the individual level this was a time of uncertainty and many businesses failed, builders as a group remained an important part of the industry, responding to the changes in their trade in creative ways. They found workable solutions to the problems and possibilities brought by the rapid growth of the city, new technology, and changing tastes. They combined traditional and fashionable elements to construct houses they could sell, and in the process they left an indelible mark on the physical character of the city.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building process; careers; competition; industrialization; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | craft worker, new technology, owner, competition, career, building process, builder, survey, industrialization |
| Subjects: | practitioner, innovation and technology management, economic development, market analysis, building construction, data collection methods, professional development, sociology |
| Topics: | Site Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here