Representation and reasoning for integrated conceptual design of building structures

Mora, R (2005) Representation and reasoning for integrated conceptual design of building structures. PhD thesis, Concordia University, Canada.

Abstract

During conceptual design the most salient characteristics of a design artefact are defined. A team of specialists is usually required to carry out this process. For buildings, the architect is the lead designer and his/her work is supported by engineers and other specialists. The distribution of work among specialists with different backgrounds and priorities and the lack of a shared understanding of each participant's view usually result in inefficiencies, redundancies, omissions and errors in the design. This translates in cost overruns, poor quality and lack of competitiveness of the building industry. Computer programs for performing structural analysis and detail design calculations have been in the market and used by practitioners for many years. However, there is still a lack of computer support to assist properly engineers in the conceptual design of building structures. One explanation for this lack of support lies in the fact that during conceptual design the engineer's work flow is highly dependent on the amount, quality and type of information that is exchanged with the architect. To address this problem, the interactions between architects and structural engineers during early design are studied and formalized in a model of conceptual design of building structures. In this model, two stages of structural support are identified which are differentiated by the type and refinement of the architectural design representations. The first stage corresponds to the earliest phases of the architectural design process in which the architectural representations are tentative, ambiguous and imprecise, whereas in the second stage an unambiguous but still imprecise three-dimensional computer model of the building architecture is made available to the engineer. This research project concentrates on the second stage of computer support. A methodology for architecture/structure integration is devised for this stage. For the implementation of this methodology a computer representation integrating the building architecture and the structural system is developed. Synthesis algorithms are also proposed that rely mostly on geometry and topology of the architecture and the structure to help identify structural opportunities, detect potential structural problems and respect constraints coming from the building architecture. A proof-of-concept software prototype is developed and implemented, and two test cases demonstrate the validity of the proposed approach for supporting conceptual structural design. It is expected that the results from this research project will lead to more integrated and efficient conceptual structural design practice for improved building performance.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: architect; architectural design; building performance; competitiveness; design practice; designer; integration; market; reasoning; structural design; test cases
Index terms: engineer, cost overrun, validity, designer, design practice, geometry, implementation, interaction, building industry, competitiveness, architect, test case, computer program, prototype, building performance, redundancy, structural analysis, reasoning, lead designer, conceptual design, architectural design, structural design, topology, integration, methodology, structural engineer, artefact, practitioner
Subjects: sociology, organizational analysis, industry analysis, software systems, management, design practice, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, mathematical modelling, architectural engineering, profession, cognitive psychology, market analysis, quality assurance, behavioral psychology, geometry and topology, research methods, structural engineering, design process, contractual arrangements, professional practice, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner
Topics: Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Cost Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here