Shipton C, H W P (2013) Making changes in practice: An ethnographic study of a hospital project. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
Changes to client requirements are inevitable during the construction phase of a project. Dominant industry discourse is concerned with minimising and controlling changes. However, there is a lack of understanding about processes of making changes. In response to calls for more research to be undertaken into working practices, the aim is to explore how changes are made in a live project. An ethnographic study of a public hospital project was undertaken over an eight-month period in order to gain insights into these practices. It was found that there was a strong emphasis on following contract change control procedures, partly as a means of demonstrating best-practice and ensuring accountability, which was deemed to be important in the public sector project. However, it often overshadowed considerations about whether or not a change was required in terms of the functionality of the building. Drawing upon structuration theory, these practices were the product of, and reaffirmed, structures of legitimation in the construction industry and the public sector concerning change management. This representation of making changes highlights how contract procedures can be useful and insufficient and where attention can be focused to explore better change management practices.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change; ethnography; practice; project management; structuration theory |
| Index terms: | change control, public sector, ethnography, accountability, change management, drawing, legitimation, working practice, functionality, client requirements, project management, construction industry, construction phase |
| Subjects: | design features, technical documentation, project delivery, control systems, sociology, administrative law, industry analysis, liability law, management, qualitative and interpretive research, professional development, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here