Spillane, J P; Flood, M; Lukumon, O O; von Meding, J K and Konanahalli, A (2013) Urban high-density construction sites and their surrounding community: Issues encountered and strategies adopted by contractors. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
Inner city developments are a common feature within many urban environments. Where these construction sites are not managed effectively, they can negatively impact their surrounding community. The aim of this paper is to identify and document, in an urban context, the numerous issues encounter and subsequent strategies adopted by on-site contractors and local people, in the mitigation of factors which negatively impact their surrounding community. The objectives in achieving this aim are to identify what effect, if any, an urban construction site has on its surrounding environment, the issues and resulting strategies adopted by contractors on the factors identified, and also what measures are put in place to minimise such disturbances to the local community. In order to meet the requirements, a mixed methodology is adopted culminating in a literature review, case study analysis, contractor and community interviews, concluding in the development of two specific questions for both perspectives in question. The data is assessed using severity indices based on mean testing in the development of key findings. The results indicate that the main forms of disturbance to the local community from an urban development include noise, dust and traffic congestion. With respect to a contractor on-site, the key issues include damaging surrounding buildings, noise control and off-site parking. The resulting strategies identified in the mitigation of such issues include the implementation of noise and dust containment measures and minimising disruption to local infrastructure. It is envisaged that the results of this study will provide contractors operating in such environments, with the required information which can assist in minimising disruption and therefore, avoiding disputes with the local community members. By consulting with and surveying those most affected, this research will illustrate to on-site management, the difficulties faced by those who accommodate such developments within their living environment.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | community; confined site; site management; stakeholder engagement; urban development |
| Index terms: | urban development, stakeholder engagement, mitigation, site management, methodology, urban environment, implementation, testing, surveying, case study, interview, traffic congestion, density, strategy, construction site, inner city, literature review, noise control, dispute |
| Subjects: | financial risk, urban design, research methods, management, transportation engineering, land use and regional development, urban sustainability, acoustic engineering, dispute resolution, community and social dimensions, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, analytical methods, construction operations, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, professional practice, work location |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Site Management, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here