Thuesen, C (2013) Pride and prejudice: Identity and collaboration in construction. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
Based on an 18 month ethnographic case study of a construction partnering project, the paper adopts practice based theory for understanding the identity formation and practices of collaboration in construction. Drawing upon practice based theory in general and actor network theory and communities of practice in particular, the construction project is interpreted as configuration of networked practices characterized by strong professional practices (e.g. architects and contractors) and locally negotiated collaboration practices. During the construction project, actors gain experiences in relation to the actual building and their profession, but concurrently they learn how to engage in collaboration with other professions in the project. These practice-based learning processes are very influential and effective. Newcomers to a profession quickly learn the name of the game – for better or for worse. Overtime they learn to behave competently at the boundaries between professions forming their identity and a sense of belonging in relation to an institutionalized role and the realization of the physical building. In this process the actors develop “pride” in terms of authorship of the physical building and membership their profession. However another consequence of these learning processes is the development of prejudices. Prejudices are often viewed as a negative aspect of building processes as it hinders collaboration among the professions. Consequently prejudices is often seen as something which should be eliminated e.g. in the partnering concept. Stemming from practice based theory the paper on the contrary argues that prejudice represents accumulated experiences from previous projects shaped by the negotiation of meaning within professions. In this perspective prejudice is integrated in the daily building practices – enabling and inhibiting collaboration. Pride and prejudice are thus central constitutive elements of present construction practices in the formation of identity and development of collaboration processes.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | identity; collaboration; practice based theory; partnering; prejudice |
| Index terms: | identity, case study, construction project, building practice, professional practice, architect, collaboration, negotiation, meaning, communities of practice, profession, configuration, partnering, building process, drawing, boundaries, actor-network theory |
| Subjects: | theoretical framing, professional development, data collection methods, profession, management, conflict resolution, knowledge management, systems engineering, property law, production management, partnership management, institututions, sociology, building construction, technical documentation |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Design Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here