Savage, D (2010) Business networks and conflict management. PhD thesis, Queen's University Belfast, UK.
Abstract
The aim of this thesis is to provide an in-depth study of conflict management in business networks. Business networks threaten to become one of the core organising principles of 21st century business life; however, there is still a lack of knowledge about how business networks work in practice. In particular, relatively little is known about the governance systems used to allow networks to operate optimally. On this issue, scholars have mostly focussed on the role of relational and legal contracts in building stable and smooth-functioning business networks. This literature has provided important insights into the formal and informal processes used by organisations to maximise resources and reduce transactions costs in networks. However, an important matter that has received only marginal attention in the literature is how conflict is addressed in business collaborations between firms. This is considered a weakness for, just as stand-alone firms need processes and procedures to solve conflict, so too will business networks. The purpose of this thesis is to redress this shortcoming. Using the existing theory on conflict management, a four pillar framework, outlining the role of procedures, structure and roles, behaviour and skills, and values and attitudes, has been developed to help analyse the function of conflict management in business networks. The study consists of three purposively selected case studies of different forms of business networks: a Private Public Partnership, a construction project and a supply chain situation. On analysing and interpreting the cases, six key findings are outlined in relation to the dynamics of conflict management in business networks. It is also found that conflict management is a proto-institution in the field of business networks.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case studies; conflict management; governance; outlining; partnership; skills |
| Index terms: | partnership, conflict management, dynamics, governance, case study, construction project, collaboration |
| Subjects: | business, conflict resolution, partnership management, management, data collection methods, systems engineering, production management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Governance, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here