Sobeih, T M (2006) Work compatibility and musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers. PhD thesis, University of Cincinnati, USA.
Abstract
Injury rates in construction are among the highest with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) constituting more than half of the total injuries and illnesses. In recent years the role of psychosocial factors in musculoskeletal injuries has been investigated in several systematic reviews but none focused on those specific to the construction industry. This research is presented in three parts, the goal of Part one was to review and critically appraise the current epidemiologic literature linking psychosocial work factors to musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers. Eight cross-sectional and two cohort studies were included in this review. High job stress was the most commonly investigated factor followed by job satisfaction, job control, and high quantitative job demands. In Part two the prevalence of MSD among construction workers was assessed and the psychosocial and physical work demands associated with their occurrence were identified using the Demand-Energizer Instrument (DEI). One hundred and forty seven construction workers (representing 3 trades) participated in the study. The one-year prevalence of MSD was high with 61. 2% reporting severe/frequent symptoms and 39. 7% having some functional impairment due to MSD. Lower back and knee were the most prevalent symptoms among the different trades. Physical task demands were the most important factor associated with MSD. After controlling for the physical demands and personal characteristics of subjects, psychosocial demands remained significantly associated with MSD; however some inconsistencies were noted (demands acted both as risk and protective factors). The goal of Part three was to integrate both the demands and energizers of work variables to produce the work compatibility variable, and to examine their association with musculoskeletal/stress symptoms. There was a significant correlation between the demand and energizer aspects of the different work-related variables. The highest compatibility was achieved in individual growth, economic, and social variables. The results of a factor analysis indicated that four work compatibility variables (work environment, physical task, performance, and job satisfaction) were significantly associated with musculoskeletal/stress symptoms. In the complex web of human-at-work system the work compatibility model significantly identified those work-related variables that were associated with musculoskeletal/stress symptoms. Both physical and psychosocial factors play a significant role in the health and safety of construction workers.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Shell, R |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | factor analysis; health and safety; injury; job satisfaction; safety |
| Index terms: | job control, health and safety, illness, job satisfaction, impairment, job stress, work environment, job demand, construction industry, systematic literature review, factor analysis, injury, construction worker |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, practitioner, industry analysis, research evaluation and metrics, health safety and environment, management, health conditions and diseases |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here